Evidence for the Evolution of a Complex Biological System

Posted by Hitch on October 10, 2020

“Molecular evolution is not based on scientific authority. There is no publication in the scientific literature in prestigious journals, specialty journals, or books that describe how molecular evolution of any real, complex, biochemical system either did occur or even might have occurred. There are assertions that such evolution occurred, but absolutely none are supported by pertinent experiments or calculations.”
Darwin’s Black Box, The Free Press, 1996.

Behe nailed it.
It was true in ’96 and it’s still true – and far more obvious.

There is not one single piece of empirical evidence showing the evolution of ANY real, complex biological system – nothing but truckloads of empty assertions that it “may have, could have, must have, we believe…”

In 40 + years of discussion and debate with evolutionists of every grade and level of education, never once have I ever received a demonstration, with empirical evidence of how any single organism evolved, over millions of years, into a new organism – i.e. a new taxonomic family. Not once. All I have ever seen is evasive maneuvers, much storytelling, hand-waving, empty assertions based on the standard Darwinian circular reasoning, and the very trivial being passed off as proof of the very great.

Darwinists are big on imagination, huge on storytelling, titanic on conjecture passed off as evidence, but minuscule of empirical evidence. And I have yet to meet just one who actually understands the problems of genetic information, genetic decay, cellular combinatorial dependencies, …

And evolutionary biology is literally devoid of any proper mathematical foundations – such as physicists MUST provide to support their theories.

“I disagree that Darwin’s theory is as `solid as any explanation in science.; Disagree? I regard the claim as preposterous. Quantum electrodynamics is accurate to thirteen or so decimal places; so, too, general relativity. A leaf trembling in the wrong way would suffice to shatter either theory. What can Darwinian theory offer in comparison?”
– Berlinski, D., “A Scientific Scandal?: David Berlinski & Critics,” Commentary, July 8, 2003

“It is an algorithm that lies at the humming heart of life, ferrying information from one set of symbols (the nucleic acids) to another (the proteins). An algorithm? How else to describe the intricacy of transcription, translation, and replication than by an appeal to an algorithm? For that matter, what else to call the quantity stored in the macromolecules than information? And if the macromolecules store information, they function in some sense as symbols.”
– David Berlinski

And guess what? Symbols do not exist in nature. Nature knows nothing of symbolism. Symbolic code systems do not and cannot arise without a founding, guiding intelligence – by definition.
Too bad evolutionists so stubbornly remain in darkness and denial of these facts.

“Steering is required to achieve sophisticated function of any kind. Much of the life-origin research community, however, continues to “live in denial” of this fact.”
– Biosemiotic Research Trends

And materialist evolutionists live in denial of any reality that contradicts their defunct theory.